<div dir="ltr">I would just like to recommend to everyone to use openwrt over ddwrt. DDWRT is pretty poorly maintained in comparison, although it seems to be more popular.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:19 PM,  <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eos@draggi.es" target="_blank">eos@draggi.es</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">This will probably help: <a href="http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/49350/is-dd-wrt-generally-more-secure-than-manufacturers-firmware" target="_blank">http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/49350/is-dd-wrt-generally-more-secure-than-manufacturers-firmware</a><span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
On 2015-04-29 10:31, Chick Tower wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I've been reading that most home routers are woefully insecure.  By<br>
replacing the firmware in these routers, do projects like DD-WRT and<br>
Tomato remove these vulnerabilities and make the routers secure?<br>
Granted, they might have vulnerabilities of their own, but they<br>
haven't been in the news for that, and I would expect open-source<br>
router firmware to be more secure than proprietary router firmware,<br>
whose manufacturers look at security as a cost item to be minimized.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
linux-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:linux-user@egr.msu.edu" target="_blank">linux-user@egr.msu.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user" target="_blank">http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>