writing to tapes
Jason D. Justman
justmanj@msu.edu
Thu, 03 Jan 2002 08:45:09 -0500
Yes, that would work fine under normal conditions which dump was designed
for (ext2). The only problem is the filesystem I am trying to back up is
(right now) a smb share on another machine mounted locally. tar cf
/dev/st0 /home/raid works just fine, but will result in me wasting about 6
gigs a day, when only about 5 meg changes (if that).
jason
Mark Szidik wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Jason D. Justman wrote:
>
> > speaking of which, does anyone know of a good application which will
> > support incremental backups? taper says it supports it, but for some
> > reason says it limits the archives to 2gig.
>
> I use dump/restore. (tar too) It can handle 9 levels of
> incremental backups. I only use two levels, a level 0 (full
> backup) and then a higher level (2) for an incremental.
>
> 0 full backup
> 1 all files changes since the last lower level
> 2 all files changes since the last lower level
> 3 all files changes since the last lower level
> etc...
>
> I believe that dump works best on idle file systems. If a
> filesystem is actively writing then dump will miss this stuff.
> Ben has mentioned in the past that Linus does not like dump's
> method of backup, so be careful.
>
> I really like the restore programs interactive function. It is
> very easy to retrive single files/directories from a dumped file
> system.
>
> -Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user@egr.msu.edu
> http://www.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user