[GLLUG] Wireless / Wired question
Gary Holbrook
gholbrook at digitalintuition.com
Sun May 23 02:20:35 EDT 2004
Well...are they connected directly together, or is there an intervening
network? Is there a good reason to use two firewalls instead of a pair of
switches? Does each endpoint have only one SMB server, or are there multiple
servers?
It sounds like you might really want a set of routers instead of "firewall"
routers. If you can disable NATting, you're in better shape. What model
devices are you using?
Ex Fed (exfed at hotmail.com) wrote:
>
> I have two locations that I would like to connect together. Unfortunately
> the locations are too far apart for wireless and on different floors so I
> will be using a physical wired 100bt ethernet to connect two wireless
> firewall routers, my user already purchased the routers. Both of the
> routers will dynamically assign the addresses.
>
> I would like the machines on the one router to be able to connect to shares
> on machines on the other router. The router manual indicates it will port
> forward, and it allows static routing configuration. Is there some way I
> could set up port forwarding for the ports required for this SMB/CIFS
> connection to that share?
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Lee
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Best Restaurant Giveaway Ever! Vote for your favorites for a chance to win
> $1 million! http://local.msn.com/special/giveaway.asp
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user at egr.msu.edu
> http://www.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
>
--
Gary Holbrook
Digital Intuition
(517)230-2692
More information about the linux-user
mailing list