[GLLUG] Software Distribution
Eduardo Cesconetto
eduardo at cesconetto.com
Sun Feb 17 14:33:52 EST 2008
Why not follow Apple's Universal Binary model?
The biggest problem with Linux is that 80% of the developers thing
"their" distro is the best one. End the flavors or reduce to a max of
a handful and UB becomes possible.
On Feb 17, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Mike wrote:
> I agree. It'd be nice to have some processor independant
> executables on Linux.
>
> Clay Dowling wrote:
>> Richard Houser wrote:
>> Windows certainly has many faults, and Microsoft seems to go out of
>> their way to make things hard (web server & database admin come to
>> mind). But commercial software distribution is a lot easier, and
>> commercial software distribution is what I am interested in. It
>> pays my bills. And in the Linux world, I need to package my
>> software differently for each distribution. That gets old pretty
>> fast, and makes it commercially impractical. I speak from direct
>> experience here.
>> Clay
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user at egr.msu.edu
> http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
More information about the linux-user
mailing list