Window managers

Sean picasso@madflower.com
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:45:31 -0400 (EDT)


Actually I will stand corrected until I see it. =)
I was told it did have better video than a trinitron, however, I don't
necesarily trust the source, since it is a windoze person, but I will take
your word for it, until I see it *grins*


On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Sean wrote:

> On 10 Apr 2001, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > Sean <picasso@madflower.com> writes:
> >
> > > Now you know why people spend $$$ for trinitron monitors *ducks*
> >
> > This monitor I've got is high-end enough anyway.  ViewSonic 17PS:
> > Flat-square screen, .25 mm dot pitch, 16.1" viewable, 1600x1200 @
> > 68 Hz, 1280x1024 @ 80 Hz, ..., 640x480 @ 160 Hz.  So I'm not
> > comparing a nice TFT to a crappy CRT, that's for sure.
>
> The PF77 is an aperature grill monitor, if i looked up the right one.
> weird maybe your lighting is off??? It does make a huge difference
> especially if you are using flourescent lights. Or maybe you have to high
> of a white point. *shrugs*
>
> I know I couldnt stand to use the portable screen 14.1 tft with a rage
> mobile for longer than about 2-3 hours. The colours were off a little and
> they definately werent as crisp.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user@egr.msu.edu
> http://www.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
>