ext2 filesystem compression
Sean
picasso@madflower.com
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:44:56 -0400 (EDT)
Personally i would suggest spending the 200 bucks on a 70gig ide drive and
not bother with compression. It generally isnt worth the time and the mess
it can create.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 minshal1@msu.edu wrote:
> Greetings GLLUGers:
>
> I remember hearing talk about transparent ext2 filesystem
> compression being added to the kernel a while back. First
> question, does anyone know if that made it into the
> kernel yet? Second question, and if so, has anyone actually
> attemped using it? Is it easy, robust, etc? Or a pain in
> the neck?
>
> I need to archive a large number of primarily text (but some
> binary) files that will be accessed very infrequently. By
> my estimation, transparent file system compression is the best
> way to save space on this archive as it needs to be accessed
> via NFS, samba, and local shell accounts. It also needs to be
> searchable by filename and directory name via find/grep and
> via windoze's "find a file on a mapped drive" thing. Teaching
> people about gzip and tar is out of the question.
>
> I'm open to other suggestions as well if anyone has a better
> idea. Thanks for any help!
>
> -Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user@egr.msu.edu
> http://www.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
>