[GLLUG] Re: mailing list format was Re: soffice52

[Sean]

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Daniel R. Kilbourne wrote:

> OK. So, to try to summarize, my suggestion is not an option? Come on,
> it is not that hard to do. Or does the person that maintains the list
> no longer read the mails?


I don't believe this is as much as a logistics problem as much as a
listserv policy problem.  The listserv we use is used by other groups and
owned by MSU Engineering so although we may have a list and an admistrator
for the list, we may not have the ability to make the minor needed
especially without effecting the rest of the lists on the listserv.

I don't see where other lists would object, since it is a rather nice
"professional" type of feature, but it is not one that we can can
arbitrarily make.

Correct me if I am wrong.





> Edward Glowacki extolled:
> > Quoted from basher584 on Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:50:19PM -0500:
> > > For some reason I don't think that will change my subject line.
> >
> > It isn't supposed to, it's supposed to put all the LUG email in a
> > separate folder, which in my mind is a better solution.  I have a
> > folder for LUG mail, a folder for reports from all of my servers,
> > a folder for problem reports, etc etc... That way if I need to read
> > all messages of a type or skip messages of a type, I can do so
> > easily.  Actually I really like Evolution's virtual folders too,
> > but Evolution itself doesn't really work well enough for me yet.
> >
> > --
> > Edward Glowacki				glowack2@msu.edu
> > GLLUG Peon  				http://www.gllug.org
> > Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality.
> >                 -- Jules de Gaultier
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-user mailing list
> > linux-user@egr.msu.edu
> > http://www.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
>
>