FW: [GLLUG] New look for website

[Edward Glowacki]

On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 09:23, Dpk wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:19:46AM -0400, Brian Hoort wrote:
> 
>    While we're talking about improvements...
>    
>    This is the only list I have ever been on that the Reply-To: is not
>    the list post address. Why is this? Is there a reason?
> 
> I can add it if is considered useful to the majority of list members,
> but it was explicitly not set for reasons:
> 
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> 
> Dennis

Evolution has "Reply to list", but IMP (a webmail program) does not.  If
your mailer supports it, "Reply to list" rocks.  However, I'm on a list
that sets "Reply-to:" back to the list, and I've found that I don't have
any way to just reply to the person without editing the "To:" or "CC:"
fields.  So, IMHO, that list is broken and linux-user is actually
behaving wonderfully as it is currently setup.

-- 
Edward Glowacki				glowack2@msu.edu
GLLUG Peon  				http://www.gllug.org
Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality.
                -- Jules de Gaultier