[GLLUG] Which distribution for Oracle server?

florian mettetal falieson at falsworld.com
Fri Aug 29 03:30:53 EDT 2003


On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 15:11, imetis at imetis.com wrote:
> Hello,
>  My organization will soon be upgrading our Oracle servers (currently 8i on NT 4), and I have convinced them that Linux is the way to go for the new OS. I'm currently researching which distribution would be the best. These servers(we will have 3: dev, production, web) will be dedicated to hosting Oracle 9i. The hardware will be Compaq ProLiant DL360
> servers, with data being stored to an IBM Tivoli SAN.
>  Oracle certifies and supports Red Hat Enterprise, and UnitedLinux (Conectiva, SCO, SuSE, TurboLinux). 
>  I've not been thrilled with Red Hat, and have not personally used any of the UnitedLinux versions. From the things I've read so far, I'm leaning towards SuSE. I'm installing that on another box as I type, to get a first hand look.
> 
> What are your experiences with these distros? Has anyone used a SAN with Linux? If so, was there anything weird I should know about? 
> I've been running Linux at home, in several flavors, for about 6 years, but this will be my first production enterprise level project. I'm sure I'll be back with more questions & updates along the way.
> 
> -- Andy
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user at egr.msu.edu
> http://www.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
> 

I personally enjoy FreeBSD very much on my servers, though none of my
personal ones are enterprise.... as they are personal. But under the
same token, I see SuSE and Redhat more as desktop linux enviroments my
self, and use them as such. Very nice interface and easy kernel
configuration but compared to FreeBSD... they are some what slow.
FreeBSD also has jails, which might be a possible subject at the next
GLLUG meeting... perhaps... ?? 

~~ Florian



More information about the linux-user mailing list