[GLLUG] Penguicon: Fewer terminals?

Caleb Cushing xenoterracide at gmail.com
Thu Mar 2 10:59:57 EST 2006


is cutting back just based on space? or is it also based on computing power?

On 3/2/06, Charles Ulrich <charles at idealso.com> wrote:
>
> Just after Tuesday's Penguicon meeting, Jeff and I discussed possibly
> reducing the number of terminals hanging off the terminal server. As we
> discussed the limitations of the room (at the meeting) and the amount of
> work and space required to set up all of the stations, I'm now finally
> wondering if 20 isn't more work and hassle than we really need to put
> ourselves through.
>
> So, I'd like to ask the GLLUG's opinion. Am I truly insane for wanting
> 20 terminals and if so, what's a reasonable number? My guess was
> something in the 10-15 range. 10 seems perhaps a little low, but 15
> might be almost as bad as 20. So maybe 12 or 13 is the optimal number?
> Arrrrrg!
> --
> Charles Ulrich
> Ideal Solution, LLC -- http://www.idealso.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user at egr.msu.edu
> http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/public/linux-user/attachments/20060302/b33a569d/attachment.html


More information about the linux-user mailing list