[GLLUG] more Penguicon thoughts
Dan DeSloover
zifferent at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 23 16:18:17 EDT 2007
I agree. Ron and I (from MonroeLUG) went to sign up to help out and were
told that it wasn't open to people outside of GLLUG. While I completely
understood the need to not want random con-people watching your
hardware, recruiting from within other area LUGs can ensure a minimum
amount of Linux knowledge, and a certain level of responsibility (which
can be verified by the individual LUG leaderships.) Just something to
think about.
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> I think we should petition for help for computer lounge volunteers
> from outside of gllug (maybe the other LUGS and UHACC). We have a
> sizeable group but it make it difficult. especially if your like me
> and the weekend was your vacation, and you don't care about the refund
> for serving 6 hours.
>
> I like the Idea of a seperate gaming room. Although I would want it to
> be a permanent installation for the weekend because the hardware would
> be too much to set up and tear down every night. We could also take
> games like Doom 3 (really violent and gory off of our list). another
> option instead of making gaming completely separate is find a way to
> partition it off from the rest of the lounge. this would be especially
> true if we can't get more machines.
>
> On 4/23/07, *Marshal Newrock* <marshal at idealso.com
> <mailto:marshal at idealso.com>> wrote:
>
> Overall, the computer lounge was a success. I think that we should
> begin planning for next year now, to avoid the last minute rush. If
> the first meeting of each month is dedicated to penguicon, that should
> be sufficient.
>
> So, my thoughts:
>
> 1) Terminal server. Once it was up and running, it was working great.
> However, right before the con, it was updated (just updated, not
> upgraded to the latest version of ubuntu), which broke it and took
> several hours of valiant work by Jeff to fix it.
>
> On a related subject, does anyone know of anything like the load
> monitor in gkrellm, except multi-column, so we can have nice large
> graphs of load for each CPU? If we'd had that, we could have
> displayed
> that on the projector. After all, the terminal server has 8 logical
> CPU's.
>
> 2) Terminals and related hardware. More is better. I'd like a 10%
> surplus for next year. If need be, extras can be stored in rooms. I
> also wouldn't mind seeing better cabling. A few seconds tying cables
> to shorten them would prevent the rat's nest that was at the center of
> every quad. It would also make it easier to quickly remove terminals
> to make room for other machines during installfest if need be.
>
> 3) Burn Unit. Largely successful. The biggest area it fell down in,
> though, was that there's only one. Somehow, next year, we need to be
> able to burn several discs at once, whether it's with multiple
> machines
> or a single machine. There's also UI and admin improvements that
> can be
> made. If Clay is agreeable, I think this could become a GLLUG
> project.
>
> 4) Printing Station. Once configured to be on the network and talk to
> the printer, it was pretty good, except that the printer in question
> does not do network at all well. Next year, we need to remember to
> bring parallel printer cables if it's the same printer.
>
> 5) Gaming Station. There was only one computer there, and it
> tended to
> be a babysitting machine. I'd like to suggest that next year, if
> we do
> anything with computer gaming, it's not in the computer lounge.
> Instead, we could probably get an empty panel room late at night,
> similar to what Ars Technica got. If we have 3 or 4 gaming machines,
> possibly with scheduled games and/or talks on gaming on Linux (both
> commercial with and without wine, and open-source), I think this would
> work out a lot better. Computer gaming would have to be staffed
> during
> the entire time that it's open, of course.
>
> We could use the space that would be otherwise taken up by Computer
> Gaming to have more terminals or more "bring your own computer" space.
>
> 6) MythTV. I think this suffered from lack of attention. It was just
> kind of sitting there. Occasional demos/talks would be good. Due to
> its need for a CATV connection, it would have to be done in the
> Computer Lounge. Stan, do you think you'd be up to this next year?
>
> 7) Installfest. More successful than we expected. Made me dislike
> Ubuntu. It was very crowded and difficult to identify the techs. We
> also had a lack of available table space. Not having Gaming in the
> computer lounge, as well as being able to quickly remove terminals,
> could help with this.
>
> One thing we may want to do next year is have a stash of snacks and
> drinks available for techs, and to have the front desk be manned by a
> tech, with as much rotation as possible. Running around like a
> chicken
> with your head cut off is exhausting.
>
> 8) Staffing. This is going to be a perpetual problem, and I don't
> have
> any quick solutions for this. Chick did his best, but there was
> insufficient resources (aka people) and too many random factors (aka
> too much fun to be had at the con, and subsequent mental crispiness).
> This will likely be a topic for several Penguicon meetings. I
> think we
> should start asking for volunteers through Penguicon at large.
>
> That's all for now.
>
> --
> Marshal Newrock
> Ideal Solution, LLC - http://www.idealso.com
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user at egr.msu.edu <mailto:linux-user at egr.msu.edu>
> http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
>
>
>
>
> --
> Caleb Cushing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-user mailing list
> linux-user at egr.msu.edu
> http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.egr.msu.edu/mailman/public/linux-user/attachments/20070423/cfd09099/attachment-0001.html
More information about the linux-user
mailing list