[GLLUG] PHP vs Python
Richard Houser
rick at divinesymphony.net
Sat Nov 10 11:11:47 EST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sean O'Malley wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Marshal Newrock wrote:
>
>> I've never heard anyone say Java is fast.
>
> Java is fast. It is what Apple was using to do the genetics search stuff
> with. (i cant think of the name of it.) and sun is pushing it hard.
Java isn't fast, but is it fast enough that you aren't going to see a
big enough performance difference to justify not using it. The
difference should be much less than, say, the difference between
processor revisions, such as the equivalent of a 3700-3750 X2 running
your code instead of a 3800 X2.
The big differences come down to methodologies of how you use the code
and what factors change in the design as a result. Java used to be very
slow back in the 1.1-1.2 days, but nowadays, all the critical parts of
the code end up triggering the JIT compilers and those sections then run
a translated equivalent in native code.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHNdhCUMkt1ZRwL1MRApwVAJ9nAhEwlkeY8kBzOMpW/8H5NEqq2wCfTQ66
9N4FZciq+xzrTBpzP+zLA8Y=
=TYES
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the linux-user
mailing list